What is natural - you wearing a shirt or a dog not wearing a shirt?

Nature
By definition - It is the green we see around + Flaura and Fauna that is there. But was it the nature or will it be the nature as in real sense?

Nature, could be anything that is around us. Before life came in, nature was the hot bubbling lava, solidifying here and there in a planet, third in the row from the sun. Did we have the so called "green nature" then? I mean, the earth did not. During the time of Dinosaurs, it is said there were no mediums, all huge or small, plants and animals!! is this the nature that we see now, it cant be called the same.

So in a practical point of view, nature is something highly dynamic. So holding on saying nature is just the trees and the animals around is highly questionable.

What is the part of man in nature? He can be a change-provider, or even a nature creater.

Change provider- Dinosaurs, as believed, had their end when an meteroite smashed into the earth and the same is even said to have impacted in such a way that it tilted the angle of the Earth's axis. That wound up a large strand of life in which were created and nurtured to be the "nature" for thousands of years. That is what is called a "change provider"
Man can be "destined" to be a change provider, where he would built up nature in the terms of things that different from the "green nature". He would eliminate many of the species, not directly but through many of his actions and creating a scenario where the fittest would remain.
In the so called "Green" Nature itself it is happening continuously as one species is causing the outsted of a different one. Just that human beings are affecting it in a large scale. Eg: A species of Frogs in Australia was wiped out by another with loads of poison and infamous in attacking the males of the first till death.

Creator- how man makes a creator? When the world has more than 70 % of its land loaded with construction, nature is not that is remaining in the rest of 30 %, but is the part that is the majority. The concrete structures, the roads, the buildings, all are creating a new nature, "a grey one". And man will ensure that only the kind of species that are adaptable to this kind of nature would remain, like the species, mosquitoes, monkeys, dogs, cats, all these are raising in their numbers more than ever in the life time of our Mother Earth.

So mankind as I look at it, is just a tool in the hands of this mother, who will have their life term over here, changing the phase of nature that is there into something new, and would finally meet their end as well, like all other species, who have their life cycle over the earth.

As for resources, if they have been provided in earth, whether it be petroleum, or be it Iron, or be it the wood, is nothing alien to our planet. Nothing has been bought in from space, but all developed here using the resources available over here. So it is all meant to make a new nature.
Adding to this, as human beings are designed, they were to use their brains to find their daily living, in the sense, they do not have the speed of a cheetah to hunt, are not as efficient a mountain climber as monkey to feed on high altitude fruits, and in simple terms are not even capable of defending themseleves from a predator of the wild, minus a gun in his hand. So he was meant by "nature" to use his brain, use the resources earth has provided us with and find out ways to multiply into a successful species.

The future nature - May be in the future, long after human beings die out, we would see species of animals eating through concrete structures and another so called " herbivore" eating out plastics. This is what I mean by creating a new nature, and scientists belive this is going to happen. Mosquitoes, or even Crocodiles will remain feeding on these animals and thus create history even after human being die out.

By conservation of what is remaining, we can not stop the motion that is happening, nor can we reverse the process. But since we, human beings are highly dependent on the other species on planet that we are hunting out in numbers, we would cause our end to come in fast. Soon we may see, eatables getting more worth than our fellow beings and people turning cannibals and again the " Survival of Fittest" reigns. This could be how the human beings will end up.

SO I OPPOSE VEHEMENTLY WHEN WE SAY WE, HUMAN BEINGS ARE DESTROYING THE NATURE. This is just the ego projecting out as we are capable of doing anything in this world. We are all just tools, and we can never even think of destroying the nature, but earth will move on with highly dynamic "nature", but what we can wind up fast, is oursleves. By exhausting the world, we can with hugh pace reach the culmination point of human race.

BUT THEN THE PRICE QUESTION COMES, "WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO LIVE AROUND LONG????"